Ecumenical Poverty Initiative

  • Home
  • News
  • About
  • Resources
  • Pastors Ending Poverty
  • Join the Movement
    • Join the Movement
    • Campaigns
    • Events
You are here: Home / Economics / A Visual Essay on the Wage-Productivity Gap

February 19, 2014 By Ecumenical Poverty Initiative 1 Comment

A Visual Essay on the Wage-Productivity Gap

In the late 1970s a gap opened up between the productivity of workers, and the amount they were being paid. The not-so-creative name for this trend is the wage-productivity gap. The causes are hotly debated, but the consequences are straightforward. The economy continues to grow through increases in productivity, but the benefits of increased productivity are not shared by workers. This means real wages stagnate, and inequality increases. It also calls into question the justice of a system in which the production of workers is divorced from the wages of workers.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics has put together a visual essay on wage-productivity gap.

BLS wage prod 1 BLS wage prod 1a

In chart 1 we see the rate of change in productivity growth compared to the rate of change in real (inflation-adjusted) hourly compensation (1). Chart 2 breaks down the trend by selected time periods. We can see that from 1947 to 1979, wages and productivity grew together. They started to separate in the 1970s, and came completely unglued in the 1980s, through the early 1990s.  The late 1990s was the only time in the past 30 years that real (inflation-adjusted) wages grew with productivity, and then in the 2000s wages remained stagnant while productivity continued to increase.

The growing gap is also reflected in the decrease in labor’s share of output.

BLS wage prod 3

 

 

For a long time the labor share was thought to be constant. Here again, the causes are both complex and disputed, but the consequences are clear, less of the work being done by workers is reflected in their wages.

Without really figuring out what’s going on, it’s tough to reverse these trends. Chances are technology, globalization, and loss of union power all play roles in driving down labor’s share of income and opening up the wage-productivity gap. In some cases (technology and globalization) those processes have benefits as well as costs, so the trick is to capture the benefits while reducing or eliminating the costs. This is not an easy task, but there are a few clear implications to these trends.

First, we should support a strong safety net. Stagnant real wages and unemployment are being caused by macroeconomic changes, not individual’s suddenly becoming less productive or less deserving. Second, we can raise the minimum wage to help insure that workers share in the gains of productivity.

 

(1) Technical note: Taking the log of both indexes allows us to see the rate of change presented visually. Instead of each tick mark representing an increase of X  in a meaningless index, each tick mark represents a percentage increase (in this case, each tick mark is a 22% increase). The gap actually looks much larger if you don’t log-transform the data first, as later changes are bigger in absolute terms than they are in percentage terms.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Economics, Poverty, Poverty Trends and Research Tagged With: wage-productivity gap

The goal of the Ecumenical Poverty Initiative is to empower and mobilize the faith community to speak and act to end the scandal of poverty in the United States.

Join the Movement

Comments

  1. Nate K says

    February 19, 2014 at 2:29 pm

    Reblogged this on Some Things Considered and commented:

    From my work blog:

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Involved

We'll send you occasional updates and opportunities for action. We won't share your address and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Join Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Featured Article

Ecumenical Poverty Initiative Joins Local and National Organizations to Oppose Tax Cuts, “Round 2”

September 12, 2018 by Ebony Grisom

Ecumenical Poverty Initiative and a diverse coalition of state and national organizations join Americans for Tax Fairness opposing the most recent tax cut proposal. The proposed cuts equal $2.8 trillion dollars over the next ten years. We oppose these cuts because they reward wealthy persons and large corporations at the expense of low income and […]

Read more articles

About Us

faithfulbudgetworksogodcanuseme-2

The goal of the Ecumenical Poverty Initiative is to empower and mobilize the faith community to speak and act to end the scandal of poverty in the United States.

Read More

Recent Articles

  • EPI Condemns Tear Gassing Asylum Seekers
  • Cooperative Baptist Fellowship Enters Payday Litigation
  • Ecumenical Poverty Initiative Joins Local and National Organizations to Oppose Tax Cuts, “Round 2”
  • EPI Endorses the Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival
  • Committing to the Common Good: The Faith Community’s Role in Addressing Predatory Lending

Search

Topics

1 Kings Affordable Care Act Ahab Anti-Poverty Ministry bonhoeffer Brazil budget Capitol workers cash Christ the King United Church of Christ Circle of Protection discipleship Donald Trump economics Farm Bill Federal Budget framing grace health income Inequality introduction Jezebel lectionary Leviticus Low-wage workers Luke Media minimum wage Naboth news newspaper Pastor Payday lending Poverty Predatory lending property questions safety net SNAP St. Louis swine Traci Blackmon visualizations wage-productivity gap

Copyright © 2019 Ecumenical Poverty Initiative

c/o National City Christian Church • 5 Thomas Circle, NW • Washington, DC 20005 • 202-232-0323 ext. 108

Website by Tomatillo Design

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.